The Journal

What is the significance of the ending of Anna Karenina?

May 23, 20264 min readbook-analysis

The ending of Anna Karenina is significant because it refuses the consolation that the rest of the novel seems to be building toward. Anna's death under the wheels of a train is not a tragic accident. It is the logical conclusion of the trap the novel has constructed around her -- and Tolstoy's devastating argument about what that trap was.

Leo Tolstoy published Anna Karenina between 1875 and 1877 in a literary journal. It is one of the most technically accomplished novels ever written, and its ending is its most argued-over element. The novel has two parallel plots: Anna's affair with Count Vronsky, which ends in her death, and Levin's spiritual journey, which ends in something like peace. Understanding why the ending matters requires understanding what Tolstoy thought he was writing.

What happens at the end?#

Anna, increasingly paranoid and isolated, convinced that Vronsky has stopped loving her, goes to the train station intending to confront him. On the platform, she sees a freight train approaching and throws herself under it. Her final thoughts -- fragmented, obsessive, darkly satirical -- run through the people and situations she is leaving behind.

Levin, in the parallel strand of the novel's ending, experiences a moment of spiritual clarity in a field while speaking with a peasant. He cannot explain it and does not try. He simply knows, momentarily, what he should be doing with his life.

Why does Anna die under a train?#

The train is not a random choice. Trains run through the novel as a symbol of the modern, the mechanical, and the fated. Anna first meets Vronsky at a train station -- and a man is killed by a train at that first meeting, which she and Vronsky both witness. The train that kills her is the same force that carried her into the affair and out of her former life.

The critic Gary Saul Morson, in his study Anna Karenina in Our Time (Yale University Press, 2007), argued that Tolstoy structured the novel to make Anna's death feel both inevitable and unnecessary simultaneously -- that the choices she and those around her made could have been made differently, but that the social and psychological machinery of her situation made different choices increasingly impossible.

What does Anna's death represent?#

Anna dies because the society she lives in offers her no sustainable position. She has left her husband, lost custody of her son, and entered a relationship that society will not accept. She cannot divorce. She cannot return. She cannot go forward. The affair that felt like freedom has become another cage.

Tolstoy's epigraph -- "Vengeance is mine; I will repay" -- has been interpreted in several directions. Some read it as God's judgment on Anna's adultery. Others read it as society's vengeance on a woman who tried to live outside its rules. Tolstoy himself, later in life, said he did not intend a simple moral judgment -- that the epigraph referred to the automatic consequences of certain kinds of action, not divine punishment.

What does Levin's ending mean alongside Anna's?#

The juxtaposition is deliberate and uncomfortable. Levin finds peace through family, land, and a return to something like religious faith. Anna finds destruction through passion, independence, and the attempt to live by her own terms within a society that will not permit it.

Tolstoy does not present Levin's path as obviously superior. Levin's peace is hard-won and fragile. But the structural argument of the novel places the two endings side by side in a way that asks the reader to compare them, to consider what conditions make one possible and the other impossible.

Is the ending a moral judgment on Anna?#

This is the question readers and critics have argued over since publication. Tolstoy was a deeply moral writer who was also capable of rendering his characters' inner lives with extraordinary empathy. The final chapters of Anna's consciousness are among the most technically extraordinary in the novel -- close, intimate, and genuinely horrifying. He does not pull back from her at the end.

The answer is probably that the ending is a structural judgment rather than a moral one: not that Anna deserved to die, but that the conditions she lived in made her death the most probable outcome of the choices available to her.

Foxing menu